On Friday 27 August 2010 12:50:39 Pieren wrote: > I'm forwarding the discussion on the next mailing list. > > is that okay if I modify the wiki page and suggest to use > "tunney=culvert" (and "ford=culvert" / "bridge=culvert") instead of the > ambivalent "culvert=yes" ?
It seems it is only ambivalent to the four or so people who make the tagging mailing list unreadable. I haven't seen them actually use the tag. The seventy people who used the tag did not have a problem with understanding what they did. bridge=culvert is nonsense: A culvert is not a bridge. ford=culvert is even more insane. There is either a ford or a culvert. It's physically impossible to be both at the same time. -- m.v.g., Cartinus _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
