----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave F." <[email protected]>
To: "Licensing and other legal discussions." <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 3:47 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] OS Opendata & the new license
On 16/09/2010 15:08, David Groom wrote:
When you say "new licence" what do you mean exactly? Do you mean the ODbL
licence on its own , or the ODbL combined with the proposed CT's.
I was under the impression they were joined at the hip & you can't have
one without the other. Am I wrong?
Well people are currently signing up under the CT's, yet OSM data is
currently still CC-BY-SA, so they are not entirely "joined at the hip"
According to the wiki [1] compatability of OS StreetView data with the Ct's
is subject to a legal review which will take place soon. I assume that the
licence / CT issues are the same for all OS Opendata.
If you inlcude the CT's, then do you mean CT version1.0 which people are
currently signing up to, or the working draft of a new version 1.1?
Well, let's say both & do a contrast & compare.
Is the new shiny 1.1 going to make a difference?
Differences are outlined on the working draft, see link below.
Let's also include people like me, who signed up a year ago (non CT) but
have been exploiting the OS data since it was made available.
Err... Do you have a link to CT1.1? Can't find it in wiki search. All
links goto 1.0
https://docs.google.com/View?id=dd9g3qjp_81272pvt54
David
Cheers
Dave F.
[1]
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue#Digital_Recified_Maps
_______________________________________________
legal-talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
