On 29 September 2010 06:36, Rob Myers <[email protected]> wrote: > Given that OSM is going to be relicencing, if the OS's licence isn't > CT-compatible then the options are for the OS to relicence their data or for > that data to be excluded from OSM's database. > > If the OS ODL isn't CT compatible, and if the OS won't relicence, this > doesn't prevent people from creating Produced Works under BY(-SA) that > include OS and OSM data.
So you are stating unequivocally that the CTs won't be altered to accommodate things like OS, regardless of how many ask for this? _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
