Gorm E. Johnsen wrote:
I sense there might be a misunderstanding here: I have _not_ changed the
geometry of the way-fords (apart from connecting them to existing
riverbanks where available, and a few other minor adjustments). I am
_not_ proposing to create ways out of single nodes tagged with
highway=ford. I'm simply asking to replace highway=ford with ford=yes on
nodes as well.
BUT adding fine detail DOES require changing the nodes to ways ...
This seems to be the misunderstanding that you and others may be missing? At
SOME scales, then a ford is simply a node - as are many features - but the
higher the zoom, there comes a point where a node MUST become a way or even an
area. So changing the top level view is simply wrong when the lower levels still
expect that element to be expanded to a way at some point ... Just because no
one has added the fine detail is no reason to remove the element into some other
'domain'. That applies in a lot of cases where people are arguing that some node
tag should be simplified. So just because YOU are not proposing to add missing
information is no reason to make that difficult for everybody else? When would
you then change them back to highway=ford ... so that the way detail can be added?
--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-----------------------------
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk//
Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
