On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 09:41:05 -0500 Richard Weait <[email protected]> wrote:
> We're* also expecting to implement a way for you to flag edits that > shouldn't be promoted to CT/ODbL, so you'll be able to accept CT, and > flag those changesets that are incompatible individually. The bad > ones won't be brought forward but your survey-based, > direct-observation contributions will continue. Many other benefits > to this approach, but that's a discussion for another list. this was mentioned on talk-au and the impracticality of marking changesets was noted. If work has a source tag then this is easy for a particular node or way, but subject to vandalism by others. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
