Coverage in Tampa is no better than Yahoo, and much worse than the USGS high res ortho.
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Martijn van Exel <m...@rtijn.org> wrote: > I just checked the MS campus in Redmond, WA - there's nothing beyond > 21 there either it seems. > > Martijn van Exel +++...@rtijn.org > laziness – impatience – hubris > http://schaaltreinen.nl | http://martijnvanexel.nl | http://oegeo.wordpress.com/ > twitter / skype: mvexel > flickr: rhodes > > > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Alan Mintz > <alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net> wrote: >> In some larger urban areas of the US (SFO, LA, etc.), we have Bing imagery >> at zoom 21 (~0.05-0.06 m/pel). The Bing spec allows for one more level (zoom >> 22), but a search in some of the obvious places has not turned up any such >> imagery. I checked downtown LA, parts of SFO, Bellevue/Redmond WA, Mountain >> View CA (Google competitive purposes), and Washington DC (only zoom 20, >> maybe for security). Has anyone seen zoom 22 imagery anywhere? >> >> In recent JOSM, you can display the zoom level of the tiles with >> right_click->"Show Tile Info" (with Auto Load and Auto Zoom set). Zoom all >> the way in until you get white imagery tiles, then back out slowly until >> they go away, then show tile info to see what the max zoom level is. >> >> -- >> Alan Mintz <alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> talk mailing list >> talk@openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >> > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
