Hi,
On 01/04/11 17:02, John Smith wrote:
On 5 January 2011 01:48, Frederik Ramm<[email protected]> wrote:
No, that is not acceptable to me. Someone who participates in OSM must have
the willingness to accept what the majority wants, or else they should not
participate in the first place.
Ummm where is the majority of OSM contributors that want to switch to
CT/ODBL and in the process loose lots of map data?
So far I've only seen a minor-majority of OSM-F members agreed to some
kind of process that might lead to a license change, and a majority of
OSM-F board members agree to a license change.
Luckily we're now all signing up to the CT which will, for the first
time, establish a well-defined path for any future license change, so
the situation you complain about will be the last of its kind.
Bye
Frederik
_______________________________________________
legal-talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
