On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 5:08 AM, MP <[email protected]> wrote: > But Potlatch is much slower, at least for me, once there are several > thousand primitives in view it will become quite unuseable.
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 5:22 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> wrote: > 2011/1/24 Steve Bennett <[email protected]>: >> 3) Poor performance. (On my environment anyway.) > > I see the same for potlatch on my environment, especially before you > can edit I usually have to wait quite a bit for potlatch to download > geometry (and if download hangs you would add already existing ways). > If you don't hold half of a big city in the memory JOSM gets quite > usable also on slower hardware (e.g. I find the performance sufficient > to edit on a 250 EUR - netbook). On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 7:00 AM, Richard Fairhurst <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, if you try > and use Potlatch to show several thousand objects you are certifiably > insane. If you want to work in a JOSM-like manner, use JOSM! Good points. I think that's a big part of it. I tend to mostly do close up micromapping, where only having a screenful of data loaded into memory is quite advantageous. I assume there's no way to do "load on demand" in JOSM? _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
