Richard Fairhurst <richard <at> systemed.net> writes: >>What's not clear is how the ODbL+DbCL licence would help this >>situation. It would at least straightforwardly permit the publishing >>of map tiles without any attribution or share-alike requirement > >Disagree. (This has been gone over ad nauseam on legal-talk, I'm just >pointing it out here for the record.)
Sorry, I didn't mean to spread misinformation. Oh well, this was the one big advantage of ODbL as far as I could see :-(. So do the produced map tiles (a Produced Work under the ODbL, I think, or am I mistaken there to?) have to be distributed under the ODbL also - or can you use any distribution terms as long as it has attribution - or what? (I'd rather not *discuss* these legal niceties here on this list but if you could forward the official word on these matters it would help. It is a pity that it's not completely idiot-proof and obvious from the licence text itself.) -- Ed Avis <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
