>It's everyone else who we have to worry about. In the last couple of months, >I've personally noticed a national railway company, a charity with a >turnover of >£100m, a vast firm of couriers, a magazine publisher, a book >publisher, all infringing our requirements/requests for attribution and >share-alike. (I've spotted these by chance: I don't go out there looking for >this stuff.) Deliberate? In some cases, definitely. You wouldn't put an >entirely fictitious credit to another organisation if you were just innocent >of the niceties.
TBH I actually feel flattered when an external organisation uses our maps. At Mottisfont and Dunbridge station, Hants, there's a map which I think could be an OSM map - reason being it shows a permissive path not on Ordnance Survey maps. On the other hand it could be just drawn by a 'local'. It would be *nice* for them to attribute, but I do think it is rather nice to see our maps being used in the real world in any case. Nick
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
