On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 11:53 -0700, Steve Coast wrote: > ...which is ignoring the 70% or so of all of those people who never > edited and can be switched over without incident.
That sounds like the thinking of the parties in a real vote, 'if everyone who didnt vote, voted for us, we would have wiped the floor' Changing that 70% doesnt have any 'incident' but they can hardly be counted has casting their vote either way. This means that if 30% are active users, 3.8% means just over 12% of people have voted. David > On 4/18/2011 11:49 AM, Toby Murray wrote: > >> As a side question: how many users still need to either accept or decline? > > A lot. If you look at the two files that I am using to pull data from, > > you will see the users_agreed.txt file has a header in it explaining > > that there are 286,582 users that signed up before the new CT was put > > into place for new users last year. Just under 11,000 have voted. So > > 3.8% of those who can vote have voted. > > > > Toby > > > > _______________________________________________ > > talk mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
