Dermot McNally <[email protected]> writes: > On 11 June 2011 00:15, Nathan Edgars II <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hence the new license acceptance >> process is not a democratic vote. > > Your definition of democracy does not seem to accord with mine. Where > did you get it?
I don't know why some people call it a vote at all. It is a question whether or not *you* agree to a contract (the CT) and allow *your* contributions to be distributed under ODbL. Your answer is not binding to anyone else. And when OSMF has enough agreements from contributors they might decide to switch licenses. A question for a real vote could be "Do you think OSM should switch to ODbL?" I am curious what the outcome of that would be. Matthias _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
