On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 04:29:51PM +0100, Thomas Davie wrote: > On 16 Jun 2011, at 16:04, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen wrote: > > > No, it would be simpler for OSM.
> If you're willing to public domain your work, you're willing to give > it to anyone under any terms. Why would you not contribute under the > new CTs if you're willing to accept any terms? The CTs constitute an agreement between the contributor and OSMF. The ODbL also includes a contractual element. For whatever reason, people may not wish to even enter such a relationship. A plain licence for the data does not involve a contractual relationship as far as my understanding of copyright (and I assume database right) licensing goes. Simon -- A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that works.—John Gall
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
