Pieren wrote: > d) Add a short stub tagged "highway=path" You can't tell without a fixme whether something is a stub because it's incomplete, or because it really is like that.
Example: http://osm.org/go/eutFfSar-- . That looks very much like a stub because bridleways don't peter out in the middle of nowhere. Surely it requires resurvey? Except this one... genuinely does peter out. > I just guess that the next mapper will compare the present > data with its own survey It's great that you have so many mappers that you can rely on footfall alone to guarantee completeness. Footpaths in remote rural areas aren't like that. Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Fixme-A-proposal-tp6853578p6861968.html Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
