Have to admit I'm a inclined to be a little lazy and often just add two nodes after the stub rather than a fixme.
Cheers Andy -----Original Message----- From: Richard Fairhurst [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 05 October 2011 13:46 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Fixme: A proposal Pieren wrote: > d) Add a short stub tagged "highway=path" You can't tell without a fixme whether something is a stub because it's incomplete, or because it really is like that. Example: http://osm.org/go/eutFfSar-- . That looks very much like a stub because bridleways don't peter out in the middle of nowhere. Surely it requires resurvey? Except this one... genuinely does peter out. > I just guess that the next mapper will compare the present data with > its own survey It's great that you have so many mappers that you can rely on footfall alone to guarantee completeness. Footpaths in remote rural areas aren't like that. Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Fixme-A-proposal-tp6853578p6861968.html Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2012.0.1809 / Virus Database: 2085/4538 - Release Date: 10/04/11 _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
