+1 on Frederick's suggestion, with the caveat that it should be possible to override the Accept request header with a "?type=pbf" argument or similar.
-mike. On Dec 22, 2011, at 5:09 AM, Peter Wendorff wrote: > I like the idea Frederick mentioned, to use standard http techniques for that. > That would allow to support different compression algorithms on the server > side, while server and client/editor would be able to decide together about > the format used. > > regards > Peter > > Am 22.12.2011 12:39, schrieb Mike Dupont: >> of course, there is not anything there. api.openstreetmap.org/pbf/ is >> just my suggestion of what we could use instead of>> >> api.openstreetmap.org/ >> mike >> >> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Parveen Arora<[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 7:35 AM, Mike Dupont >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> you could also use a different base user or api/pfb or something. >>>> api.openstreetmap.org/pbf/ >>> File not Found at this link. >>> >>> -- >>> Parveen Arora >>> www.parveenarora.in >>> E-Mail: [email protected] >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> talk mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > ---------------------------------------------------------------- michal migurski- [email protected] 415.558.1610 _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
