What I haven't seen to yet, is a justification for even contemplating
this. Is download bandwidth to editing clients even remotely an issue
(even in not so well developed countries)?
Simon
Am 22.12.2011 17:14, schrieb Michal Migurski:
+1 on Frederick's suggestion, with the caveat that it should be possible to override the
Accept request header with a "?type=pbf" argument or similar.
-mike.
On Dec 22, 2011, at 5:09 AM, Peter Wendorff wrote:
I like the idea Frederick mentioned, to use standard http techniques for that.
That would allow to support different compression algorithms on the server
side, while server and client/editor would be able to decide together about the
format used.
regards
Peter
Am 22.12.2011 12:39, schrieb Mike Dupont:
of course, there is not anything there. api.openstreetmap.org/pbf/ is
just my suggestion of what we could use instead of>>
api.openstreetmap.org/
mike
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Parveen Arora<[email protected]> wrote:
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 7:35 AM, Mike Dupont
<[email protected]> wrote:
you could also use a different base user or api/pfb or something.
api.openstreetmap.org/pbf/
File not Found at this link.
--
Parveen Arora
www.parveenarora.in
E-Mail: [email protected]
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
----------------------------------------------------------------
michal migurski- [email protected]
415.558.1610
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
