On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 3:45 AM, John Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > It surely no longer is to have the most accurate map, all the > remapping is usually from lower quality data sources, and time spent > remapping could have been spent making the map better, that hardly > seems like a very pragmatic approach to me.
Speak for yourself. A couple of my remapping changesets contain the following: deletions: 89/creations: 501 deletions: 201/creations: 426 Some have more deletions than additions but that is because the original TIGER import was over-noded anyway. Some of these ways haven't been touched since Bing imagery became available. I'm guessing improvements are probably more the norm than reductions in quality. Toby _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
