On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 1:23 AM, Nathan Edgars II <[email protected]> wrote: > On 1/10/2012 12:16 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote: >> >> In short, this remapping exercise I'm doing actually leads to better >> data quality. So I disagree with your assertion that the license >> change is "a disruptive change for little or no benefit". > > > So what you're saying is that you're only improving the map because the OSMF > is forcing you to?
So what? The map gets improved in the end. And I have considered the whole license debate and have agreed with the need for the CT and the arguments for ODbL, so I don't see any problem. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
