Andrew Ayre wrote: > I can't imagine why the majority wouldn't agree on improving > attribution.
I think the attribution is great as it is. There's a whacking great big OSM logo and a big "Copyright & licence" link that leads to a more cogent and helpful explanation of the licence than anything found elsewhere. I'm not sure what more you might want - a looped .wav of Brian Blessed shouting "OOOOOPPPEEEENSTREEEEETMAAAAAAAAP" and reading out every contributor's name? cheers Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/No-attribution-on-osm-org-tp5550136p5550699.html Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
