I've sent CeesW a message asking him to join the discussion here. Most of his other edits seem legit, but the comment on this changeset is somewhat remarkable: "... data reconciliation ODbl".
Let's hope he explains himself. Greets, Floris Looijesteijn On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Maarten Deen <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2012-05-29 08:41, Thomas Davie wrote: >> >> "It's So Funny" has not copied your data here, he has simply modified >> it (in this case, changing highway=residential to >> highway=unclassified). When the redaction bot is unleashed, if you >> have still not accepted the CTs (do you have a particular reason not >> to?), this data will be deleted. There is no problem here. > > > It's So Funny changed a way that was created by CeesW on 2012-01-09: > <http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/144917597/history> > > The previous way was deleted by CeesW in the same changeset. > <http://www.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/way/7539781/history> > > So the person to confront would be CeesW, not It's So Funny. Offending > changeset seems to be > <http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/10345339> > > Regards, > Maarten > > >> On 29 May 2012, at 06:06, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen >> wrote: >> >>> >>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.984706&lon=4.351842&zoom=18&layers=M >>> >>> Look at Caracasstraat ! >>> (among others in the region). >>> >>> Gert >>> >>> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >>> Van: Richard Weait [mailto:[email protected]] >>> Verzonden: maandag 28 mei 2012 21:53 >>> Aan: ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen >>> CC: [email protected]; [email protected] >>> Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-talk] OSM : It's a shame !!! >>> >>> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 3:42 PM, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert >>> Gremmen <[email protected]> wrote: >>> [ ... ] >>>> >>>> However, it was not meant that the data were simply to be copied, >>>> deleted >>>> and re-pasted into the map using a fake account. >>> >>> >>> True. Copy / pasting is not the same as remapping from permitted >>> sources. >>> >>> Could you provide a link or ID to one of the nodes, ways or relations >>> that concern you? >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> talk mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> talk mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
