On 29 May 2012, at 10:15, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen wrote:
> At the time it was judged to be important to > keep reference to the original and data. > I remember copying lots of old AND tags > onto my created roads. > > I think what should be leading here is > the version number, as recorded by the server. > > Whatever excuse there may be, including reference to > anonymous lawyers, it's simply > a shame using cut and paste to change ownership > of nodes and ways. > It was me that basically change the majority of > this area into a nice, well aligned and usable > map from the mess (in terms of layout) we got from AND. > > It is up to the new author to use GPS or Bing and > create a new way, using new nodes. > That is the intend of OSM, it has always been that > and it's not because some users are bad/lazy losers that > cheating can be justified. I'm sorry that you feel it's "cheating" to take the path of least resistance to valid, ODbL licensed data, personally, I would rather this guy had taken a path of even less resistance – simply tagged the way "odbl=clean". Thanks Tom Davie _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
