Non-commercial only licenses discriminate against fields of endeavor and are definitely not open. See 6 of http://opensource.org/docs/osd or 8 of http://opendefinition.org/okd/. No derivative licenses are also not open - you can't modify the data.
Another explanation is http://freedomdefined.org/Permissible_restrictions#Restrictions_which_are_no t_permissible. CC doesn't claim that any NC or ND license is open either. From: Pavel Melnikov [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2012 8:31 PM To: Simone Aliprandi Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] opendata diagram Forgive my incompetence, but what about other open licenses? Say, CC-non-commercial, Cc-no-derivatives, and a whole bunch of combinations of by, sa, nc, nd? Em you consider them not-open? I'm sure there are more examples, I only know about cc ones. On Sep 3, 2012 3:04 AM, "Simone Aliprandi" <[email protected]> wrote: I realized a diagram including all the most important opendata licenses that are now available, and classifying them according to their legal effects (attribution and share-alike, attribution only, public domain). I hope this work can be useful to better understand the actual situation of geodata (open)licensing: http://aliprandi.blogspot.it/2012/05/opendata-graph.html Bye, -- Simone Aliprandi - http://www.aliprandi.org _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
