If you read the opendefinition “A piece of content or data is open if anyone is free to use, reuse, and redistribute it — subject only, at most, to the requirement to attribute and/or share-alike.”
(here more details - http://opendefinition.org/okd/) you can understand that the CC-NC, CC-ND and the mix of this aren't open license. these are public licenses Jordan Hatcher - the main author of the ODbL and the project Open Data Commons - made this schema http://www.jordanhatcher.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Open_v_Public_licenses_Venn.002-001.png On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Pavel Melnikov <[email protected]> wrote: > Forgive my incompetence, but what about other open licenses? Say, > CC-non-commercial, Cc-no-derivatives, and a whole bunch of combinations of > by, sa, nc, nd? Em you consider them not-open? > I'm sure there are more examples, I only know about cc ones. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
