On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Jonathan Bennett <[email protected]> wrote: > On 18/09/2012 13:42, Vincent Privat wrote:
> OK, if we're playing WikiLawyer pissing games, the statement about DWG's > power says "authorised", not "limited to". Part of DWG's remit is to > deal with disputes, and this is very clearly a dispute over data. Ergo... The DWG is mandated by the foundation ([1]), no ? And here ([2]), it says "The OpenStreetMap Foundation is an international not-for-profit organization supporting, but not controlling, the OpenStreetMap Project." The dispute is not between contributors but between the French community and the DWG... Pieren [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group "The Data Working Group ([email protected]) is authorised by the Foundation to deal with accusations of copyright infringement and serious Disputes and Vandalism. Minor incidents of vandalism should be dealt with by the local community using counter-vandalism tools and processes. " [2] http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Main_Page _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
