Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
We provided explanations many times...
>Separate polygons can come from:
>- different ownership of building parts
...
>It is not data errors, but much more detailed geometry compared to
>what you can do by simply surveying or trace on aerials.
IMHO it is a data error when one building is split up into several
buildings because the one building has more than 1 owner, or do you
tag the parts as parts and have eventually a method of recombining
these parts into one building? As far as I know we do not at all tag
owners of objects in OSM.
I'm happy to split buildings where I have house numbers ... then there is an
identifiable difference between the two halves. But I am sorry Christian I
simply do not accept that cadastre is producing the detail you claim. NONE of
the buildings that I DID waste time tracking back through the Main site were
identifiable as separate structures !!! And the facts in the database do not
support your claim :( The area identified a couple of days back had small
buildings with multiple odd shaped blocks that bare no relation to the imagery
and have no additional tagging. It would be easier for a french speaker to get
back through the Cadastre site, but when I did manage to get to that area I
could see little to identify separate buildings that were being displayed in
OSM! Heck, the OS streetview data is cleaner and we decided NOT to import that ...
I have no doubt SOME French mappers are using the data as intended, but on the
whole I don't think the data does anything to improve OSM :(
--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-----------------------------
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk
Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
