Gerdami - DWG is short for Data Working Group 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group

On Oct 19, 2012, at 8:49 AM, gerdami <gerd...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Just wondering what DWG stands for.
> 
> Best regards,
> gerdami
> Belgian - French
>  
> Not sent from any iPhon/iPad, never
> 
> From: Sam Larsen <samlars...@yahoo.co.uk>
> To: Christian Rogel <christian.ro...@club-internet.fr>; OSM Talk 
> <talk@openstreetmap.org>; "osmf-t...@openstreetmap.org" 
> <osmf-t...@openstreetmap.org> 
> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 12:06 PM
> Subject: Re: [Osmf-talk] [OSM-talk-fr] [OSM-talk] Continued aggression 
> against French contributors (cadastre integration)
> 
> Christian,
> 
> Unfortunately I don't know the background or details of this discussion 
> because a) you haven't provided any, and b) i don't follow data lists, french 
> lists or talk because there is just too much talk :)
> Have any french speakers attempted to get involved with DWG?  If not, i 
> suggest that someone puts themselves forward for the group as the DWG clearly 
> needs better communications with the french speaking OSM community.  I'm sure 
> there are many french speaking contributors around the world that would like 
> to see more communication in french with the working groups.  
> The directors don't control the working groups.  The working groups do their 
> own work and then report their work to the directors and discuss it.
> My experience of working groups is that if you want to get involved you can.  
> The current situation of no french-speaking members of the DWG is clearly not 
> working for your community.  You need someone who speaks good French and 
> English and can dedicate time every week to this WG.  They can then act as 
> the french speaking representative who communicates with your communities.  
> Try to be constructive, and remember the DWG are all volunteers and probably 
> dedicate much more of their personal time to this project than most others.
> 
> The best way to 'charge DWG with it's rude behaviour' is to help them.  I'm 
> sure they are not trying to piss you off.
> 
> Sam
> 
> 
> 
> >________________________________
> > From: Christian Rogel <christian.ro...@club-internet.fr>
> >To: OSM Talk <talk@openstreetmap.org>; osmf-t...@openstreetmap.org 
> >Sent: Thursday, 18 October 2012, 20:44
> >Subject: Re: [Osmf-talk] [OSM-talk-fr] [OSM-talk] Continued aggression 
> >against French contributors (cadastre integration)
> > 
> >As I said previously, the DGW cannot be only charged about its rude 
> >behaviour.
> >
> >The fault is up to the Foundation. Let 's say ay that the Board of 
> >Directors, newly elected, has to kept
> >the Community in peace.
> >
> >It has to clarify its links with the DWG and precise in which cases a 
> >so-called efficient rule (and not discussed by
> >the Community) may be reformed to a statement by which it will reaffirm its 
> >authority and its sense of diplomacy
> >for a more united Community.
> >
> >It 's all politics in a broader sense (and not policy).
> >
> >By the way, could you stand receiving any message in a language you cannot 
> >understand. that seems to be looking for
> >infuriating the non-English speaking users? Not very smart.
> >
> >
> >Christian Rogel
> >OSMF member
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >osmf-talk mailing list
> >osmf-t...@openstreetmap.org
> >http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk
> >
> >
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> osmf-talk mailing list
> osmf-t...@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> osmf-talk mailing list
> osmf-t...@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmf-talk

Alex Barth
http://twitter.com/lxbarth
tel (+1) 202 250 3633





_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to