> From: sly (sylvain letuffe) [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2012 1:41 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Standard way across edits to tag changesets > > Le dimanche 21 octobre 2012 22:26:56, Marc a écrit : > > Hi > > > > Thanks for your proposal. I commented it. > > Those were very good comment, I integrated most of them. But I'm usure > if "bot=yes" wasn't allready used. If that was the case, I think > compatibility with what has been done is more important than the tag's > name.
The following are the changeset tags used at least 100 times as of a couple weeks ago created_by | 12488949 comment | 9882933 version | 2013859 build | 2011697 bot | 317744 source | 85151 create_by | 6607 redacted_changesets | 4046 created by | 3812 survey_date | 1097 transport | 1024 survey_type | 1015 CLC:content | 880 CLC:year | 880 created | 734 is_in | 725 source:date | 655 note | 529 type | 517 is_in:country | 473 (new key) | 411 import | 324 author | 249 Source | 210 user | 202 source:name | 201 source_url | 193 source_ref | 186 bot_url | 185 osc filename | 170 is_in:state | 167 reviewed | 140 url | 110 merged | 104 uploaded_by | 102 name | 100 A few comments on the ones that may not be obvious: Build/version are used by some editors to expand on created_by transport=car and transport=foot are the two common values for that key bot=yes created_by values indicate overwhelmingly specialized programs (e.g. the redaction bot) The current best practice tagging for an import changeset appears to be import=yes, source=* and website=link to the appropriate wiki website. It is also useful sometimes to have internal upload details in the changeset tags (e.g. a filename or unique ID which allows you to find which upload failed if problems are later found) _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
