On 11/21/2012 12:51 AM, Greg Troxel wrote: > > Robin Paulson <[email protected]> writes: > >> i've done some quite detailed editing near where i live, i'd >> appreciate anyone who is interested taking a look and responding. >> >> i'm not sure what to make of the result. for one, my partner, a >> non-mapper, has told me she finds it very confusing, which potentially >> raises questions >> >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-36.91503&lon=174.77973&zoom=16&layers=M > > I think it's important to separate what should be in the database vs > what should be rendered. > > I find the rendering symbol for access=private ways to be unpleasing, > because they have more visual weight than accessible ways.
I wouldn't have tagged the driveways with access=private unless there was a sign that actually says so. Not because of any rendering issue, but because I am lazy and it doesn't really add any information. I would hope that any routing application would treat highway=service + service=driveway as access=destination automagically. Otherwise how are you going to get pedestrian door-to-door routing for "Inkerman Street 11/16". --- m.v.g., Cartinus _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
