Hi Tom, Yes, I know about the process. It is good that it is setup :-)
It seems like the technical aspects are addressed by hosting them on the us OSM servers. The "soft / arbitrary criteria" are judgment questions about where the OSM community is at. However, what I was really asking was given the context I described combined with the process as currently defined, would any of these layers have a chance of getting approved? Thanks Jason On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Tom Hughes <[email protected]> wrote: > On 21/02/13 15:05, Jason Remillard wrote: > >> I wanted to confirm the major reason we only have 4 layers on osm.org, >> is a resourcing issue, rather than a political issue. > > > It's a "nobody has proposed a layer that meets the criteria laid out in the > policy" issue. This is (astonishingly) one area where we do actually have a > well defined written policy: > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Strategic_working_group/New_Tile_Layer_Guidelines > > Tom > > -- > Tom Hughes ([email protected]) > http://compton.nu/ _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
