On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 08:45:55AM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote: > > Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> writes: > > I think you can't define this on a global level, it depends heavily on the > > local activity whether it makes sense to enter a mid-term interruption into > > OSM or ignore it. > > Agreed that it's tricky, but for right now, I'd say a week is short > enough to let something be, and a year is too long. The tricky part is > From 2 weeks to 3 months. (That's a US-centric view.)
Its not that complicated IMHO - If the data is still useful with the fault not beeing mapped - and rebuilding the infrastructure is going to happen - let it untouched. If people will need a 300km divert to get over the river, and the bridge will not be replaced due to economic reasons its a different thing. Flo -- Florian Lohoff [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
