On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Paul Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
> As previously stated, admin levels 3 and 5 depending on status as a nation > or reservation, respectively. Looking at the admin levels, I agree 3 and 5 would appear to fit. But boundary=domestic_dependent_nation (not a currently accepted tag, just a place holder) would eliminate problems of which admin level the boundary is assigned. I don't care for the term aboriginal_lands as proposed on the wiki. I don't believe we need to tag small tribal lands when they are remote from the main tribal boundary. However, I don't have any good examples to offer. One part of my original message I still need help with. Why aren't we adding these boundaries to OSM? If it is just that no one as added any or is there an issue I'm not aware of? Personally I'd like to start adding in these boundaries, at least in the US and then only for geographical areas I'm familiar with. -- Clifford OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
