On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Paul Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
> It's a little bit of a chicken/egg thing right now. As far as I'm aware, > rendering of tribal nations went offline in mapnik around the time I > pointed out the overly broad tagging and that having most of Oklahoma and > big chunks of New Mexico hatched in white on green "IR" (had the former > tagging scheme been used on all 200+ such territories in North America) > would have been awkward and was misleading due to the nearly identical "NR" > hatch of nature reserves circa summer 2010 when I moved my geographic focus > to indian country. Is rendering the issue or tagging? You provoked me to look further. I found a level 4 admin boundary with a boundary:type of aboriginal_lands for the Hoopa Valley Tribe. Previously I was only looking for a name with the work reservation. It was just added August 4, 2012, relatively recently. I think your suggestion of a level 3 or 5 would be more appropriate. At first glance it looked like the Six Rivers National Forest, but it actually the Tribal boundaries. Hoopa Valley Tribe http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=41.0997&lon=-123.6757&zoom=12&layers=M -- Clifford OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
