+1 to Alex's original post -- the new attribution mark is well designed and versatile for its purposes. The shape of the folded map links the attribution mark with our logo.
+1 spiffed up copyright page BUT the proportion of image to information "above the fold" still needs finetuning, as well as the exact text. On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Frederik Ramm <[email protected]> wrote: > John, > > > On 04/24/2013 03:56 PM, the Old Topo Depot wrote: > >> The proposed mark is very well suited as a replacement. It is simple, >> minimalistic, and works well on a variety of backgrounds. >> > > You wrote the above as a "+1" to a statement from Mike Cuttler that said > > What should be done first is establishing good visual identity for >> OpenStreetMap, primarily through logo (both long 'OpenStreetMap' and >> short 'OSM' version) with special attention for usability - meaning >> that we should be able to put it everywhere and brand would be >> recognizable. >> > > Are you therefore saying that what has been designed as an attribution > mark should be our new logo, or are you saying that there does not have to > be a likeness between the logo and the attribution mark? > > Bye > Frederik > > -- > Frederik Ramm ## eMail [email protected] ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" > > > ______________________________**_________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/talk<http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk> > -- @lizbarry <http://twitter.com/lizbarry>
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
