Hi Folks, I'm going to repeat Mikel and gently encourage us to close out the conversation on Firefox and browsers in general. These certainly aren't invalid points, but I think your points have been made and heard.
For my own part, I've really enjoyed using iD-- it's been much more accessible than P2 or JOSM for me personally, and it's made me more eager to show my friends OSM and how to edit it. That's a pretty big win in my book. Thanks iD team for your hard work, and thanks everyone else for testing it so thoroughly! I'm sure the devs appreciate the feedback! On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Serge Wroclawski <[email protected]> wrote: > Also, let's not all assume that performance under FF is so much better for > PL2. > > I've found that while iD is indeed slower on FF than on Chrome, it's > still faster than PL2 is on my laptop. > > The issues that Firefox has with iD are the same issues Firefox has > with Leaflet when using vector graphics. > > If you look at a recent map I made, you see what I'm talking about: > > http://www.emacsen.net/nyheatmap/map2.html > > The performance of this map under Firefox is less than good, but under > Chrome, it's just fine. > > I use FF as my main browser but am aware of this limitation of the browser. > > - Serge > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
