On 25.06.2013 21:35, Peter Wendorff wrote: > Am 25.06.2013 19:57, schrieb Mulone Moligiangi: >> On 25/06/2013 17:22, Jonathan Bennett wrote: >>> * What are you hoping to show with this survey? What use do you see this >>> information being to the OSM community, and will they see the results? >> I'm working on the tagging process, trying to understand how it works on the >> wiki and how people reach consensus on difficult issues. >> The OSM community will see the results in academic articles. > Sorry to ask back carefully here again: > Do we have to extend "will see the results in academic articles" by "if > they have enough money to buy the corresponding academic > newspaper/magazine"? or by ", which are ensured to be available free of > charge and for anybody interested."? > > One of my personal main problems with academic research is that it's > incredible expensive to look into articles without having access to them > (or to libraries which pay for that access somehow), so this would be at > least a good argument for me (and I guess some others) to put more > effort in telling you more detailled stuff, I guess ;)
+10 Why should I help a research if some big player make money of this knowledge/result and even the researcher have to pay money to get it publish. Knowledge is substantial for men kind and should be free for everyone. colliar
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
