Pieren wrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Frank Little <[email protected]> wrote:
Richard Z wrote
As mapped, the waterway=stream (Way #138911739) runs underground
(layer=-1),
probably through a culvert given the way the stream left and right are
separately outlined as waterway=riverbank (and without layer=*). The way
(stream) should be tagged as a culvert.
Perhaps there is in reality a bridge not a culvert, in which case the road
needs splitting and the appropriate new road segment tagged as bridge=yes.
In either case, a layer tag is not needed for rendering.
+1
Bridge or culvert, one way has to be split (the road for bridge or the
stream for culvert) to identify the structure and one of the ways
needs a tag layer. It's true that the shared node is wrong here
excepted if it's a ford. It needs a local survey.
Same mapping issues can be found between roads and railways, railways
and rivers, etc
Pieren
Unless it is a level crossing of road/rail, of course (in which case a tag is
needed on the common node, just as with fords).
But when did this happen as reported by Richard Z.:
QUOTE
The initiative to have implicit layer tags for those feature was voted down so
every tunnel and bridge should
now have one.
UNQUOTE
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
