On 15/03/2014, Fernando Trebien <[email protected]> wrote: > I now agree that the "layer" tag should be used as locally as > possible, so I think Richard had good intentions when proposing this. > At the same time, I think you, Frederik, has a good point that > arriving at a threshold for that number is quite hard. What exactly do > we want to avoid? Really, really long ways with a layer tag. So why > not set this threshold higher? Say 10 km?
Validator rules are a good thing, but I think that "length of a way that has layer=*" to detect misuse of the layer tag is beside the point. Whatever threshold you use, there'll false-positives and false-negatives. How about something along the lines of "negative layer but no tunnel tag (or positive/bridge) and no/too many crossing ways" ? _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
