I would be less concerned about the bitcoin aspect of it, but given that the user is adding further information which is quite useful, it should be clear if he actually has permission to do so (and a valid source tag would be a good idea too).
Simon Am 30.04.2014 00:17, schrieb Andreas Goss: > I just stumbled over > http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/24b22n/bitmap_app_cointerestorg_openstreetmapcom/ > > > So far it looks like menufy.com or someone else has been adding hundrets > of restaurants with payment:bitcoin=yes to OpenStreetMap, even though > most of those restaurants do NOT accept Bitcoin at their physical location. > > This is the user account: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Blobo123 > > It sometimes refer to this > http://www.coindesk.com/menufy-now-supports-bitcoin-payments-400-us-restaurants/ > which even states: "The proprietors might not even be aware that they > are accepting bitcoin payments." > > It would be great if someone with more experiance could look into this, > especially as a revert is probably needed at least for the > Bitcoin-payment tag. > > Andi > __________ > openstreetmap.org/user/AndiG88 > wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:AndiG88 > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
