2014-12-31 0:26 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]>:
> the combination of amenity=restaurant and cuisine=fastfood seems pointless > to me, fastfood is not a reasonable cuisine type when you look how cuisine > is used in osm (and fwiw, there are only 12 occurences of cuisine=fastfood > in the db, i.e. it's non-existent). > Ok guys, cuisine=fastfood was something I came up with after ten seconds of thought, I know it's a bad example. Let's forget it. I found a better example, amenity=place_of_worship + religion=christian that is Q16970 (Church (building)). amenity=place_of_worship itself can be Q199451 (Pagoda) and religion=christian itself can be anything connected to christianism (monasteries, cemeteries..) So you need a combination of these two tags for this project to work. Again, I think this project is great. It's just that I'm afraid it won't get any traction if people see that you can't define all terms. On the other hand, amenity=fastfood in osm might be more inclusive than > wikidatas "Fastfood restaurants" (Q1751429), so mapping them 1:1 might also > lead to some errors. > These terms with fuzzy borders will never be 100% the same in both projects. I think 90% is pretty good.
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
