On 3 May 2015 at 17:05, Bryan Housel <br...@7thposition.com> wrote: > I like the `contact:*` tags, but only because it simplifies a few things > in the iD editor. When copying and pasting an object, we really want to > remove the name/address/contactinfo so that the pasted object doesn’t have > the same values. > > If all the custom keys are grouped under `contact:whatever` this is easy > to do, otherwise we need to build the logic into the editor to remove the > values. I’m certainly ok with having the keys either way, just saying this > is one area where a namespace helps. > > For the curious, the code to do this is here: > > https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/blob/master/js/id/behavior/paste.js#L4-L18 > > Thanks, Bryan > > > Bryan, as a copy operation, I'd expect all the tags to be copied - it is after all the purpose of copying ! why should the contact details of a pasted object be different ?
URL / website - If the thing has a website, then that should be tagged as website. If the URL is to a document, use URL. I'm happy both should stay. As for contact:*, I'm not bothered either way - but have a preference for choice - so that if there's a reason for its use, it can be used. I'd be interested in a response to the idea of an object having a 'data manager' tag - for one who should be consulted before editing an object - a person who has agreed to maintain that object in the db. -- Mike. @millomweb <https://sites.google.com/site/millomweb/index/introduction> - For all your info on Millom and South Copeland via *the area's premier website - * *currently unavailable due to ongoing harassment of me, my family, property & pets* T&Cs <https://sites.google.com/site/pmailkeey/e-mail>
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk