Am 07.05.2015 um 13:50 schrieb Richard Z. <[email protected]>:
>> then contact:twitter is also flat
>> out wrong, because many companies will not reply and maybe not even read
>> what you tweet them.
>
> this is one of the reasons why contact:twitter is much better then
> twitter=* because the first one explicitly says it can be used for
> contacting while the other could mean anything else that you can
> do with twitter.
people will not be more inclined to respond to enquiries via a certain medium
if we put a contact prefix in osm, or did I misunderstand you and you propose
to use both tags, one for their Twitter account and the other if they react to
Twitter messages?
> Likewise contact:website is reasonably clear while website=* may or
> may not offer a contact method.
indeed, there are lots of reasons why someone will visit a website and contact
is only a subset of them.
> In addition most companies will have
> different web pages for different purposes and website=* would be
> typically the main page and not the contact form.
wouldn't contact:url or contact:webpage then be a better tag for this?
Cheers
Martin
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
