On 29/06/15 15:08, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > The step from 2D to 3D would add a lot of complexity on the mappers, > narrowing down the mass of contributors potentially willing and able to > participate. Everyone would have to deal with this: It's difficult to imagine > introducing 3D in parallel (as long as you don't do it completely > disconnected, i.e. a fork), because everything is connected and someone not > aware of 3D information would damage it inadvertently as soon as he was > starting to make 2D edits on 3D data.
I'm not so bothered about 3D, but rather making it a little clearer on 2D maps that one HAS to go a particular way when the road other side of the building IS 5 stories below, and the main road is three stories below that. People who have visited Malta will know what I am saying, but following a satnav somewhere you don't know after a long flight ... it would be nice if the map warned you :) -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
