> Where is this master-master documented? I think some may shoot it >> down, calling it a category. I use the operator and network tags to >> group 'concessions', although here in Belgium they correspond to the >> provinces. >> > > It is not documented. > In the Netherlands we have at present 35 concessions for buses [1]. These > concessions will change operators regularly (they range in duration from 10 > to 20 years, so on average every year 2 concessions will end) and a new > operator has new ideas, new lines, etc. Also sometimes concessions get > split or combined. > Making a relation for each concession greatly improves maintainability. > You only have to load one relation in JOSM to get all lines and work from > there. > I would be really cross if someone decides to delete those relations :P >
No worries I wasn't proposing to delete them. > > I believe officially you should only add nodes with >>> "public_transport=stop_position", but in absence of those I also add >>> "highway=bus_stop" (or even tag those with >>> "public_transport=stop_position" which is not entirely correct). >>> >> >> Don't you mean public_transport=platform in that first sentence? I >> think the official 'party line' is to add both platforms and >> stop_positions. >> > > That's not how I do it. But again: I'm not saying I'm doing it 100% > correctly. > Me neither. I only add the platform nodes (nodes beside the way) to the route relations. Maintenance on these route relations is hard enough, without complicating matters unnecessarily. Polyglot
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
