A good simplification would be to allow bridge=culvert or tunnel=culvert on a
highway node A lot simpler and more rapid to trace or revise highways with
successive culverts.
Pierre
De : Richard <[email protected]>
À : [email protected]
Envoyé le : mardi 31 mai 2016 9h03
Objet : [OSM-talk] ford=no for highways which are known to have no fords?
Hi,
often enough I get messages from people saying that drawing a bridge
or culvert for every minor highway/waterway crossing causes more
trouble than use and I tend to agree.
Splitting the ways and applying a bunch of tags for every single
tunnel/bridge is work and has a non-zero chance to introduce some
errors for zero gain.
So I was wondering - if we know that a long segment of a highway
has no fords - could it be marked with ford=no? Or other similar
attribute?
For some classes of roads like freeways this could be also
declared to be the implicit default.
Richard
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
