On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 03:00:04PM +0000, Pierre Béland wrote: > A good simplification would be to allow bridge=culvert or tunnel=culvert on a > highway node A lot simpler and more rapid to trace or revise highways with > successive culverts.
You mean http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Simple_one_node_bridge I had that (or very similar) idea before but did not earn much approval.. hence this idea with ford=no. Richard > > > Pierre > > > De : Richard <[email protected]> > À : [email protected] > Envoyé le : mardi 31 mai 2016 9h03 > Objet : [OSM-talk] ford=no for highways which are known to have no fords? > > Hi, > > often enough I get messages from people saying that drawing a bridge > or culvert for every minor highway/waterway crossing causes more > trouble than use and I tend to agree. > Splitting the ways and applying a bunch of tags for every single > tunnel/bridge is work and has a non-zero chance to introduce some > errors for zero gain. > > So I was wondering - if we know that a long segment of a highway > has no fords - could it be marked with ford=no? Or other similar > attribute? > > For some classes of roads like freeways this could be also > declared to be the implicit default. > > Richard > > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > > > _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
