Correct, without NASA in the name we miss the important relation with the agency.
2016-06-27 13:29 GMT+02:00 Adam Schreiber <[email protected]>: > NASA could be added to the operator tag. That could cause some confusion > with regard to JPL as it's operated by the California Institute of > Technology for NASA. > > Cheers, > Adam > On Jun 27, 2016 07:05, "Fabrizio Carrai" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hello all, >> I was checking about the NASA sites and I found the "NASA" term was not >> always presente in the name tag: >> >> "Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center", Houston [1] >> "Kennedy Space Center" (See Note below) >> "Jet Propulsion Laboratory" , Pasadena, California [2] >> >> The Goddard is an exception (IMHO correct and complete) >> >> "NASA Goddard Space Flight Center" [3] >> >> Note: The Kennedy Space Center limits are not defined, I don't know if >> they can be. >> >> Sometime "NASA" is indicated as "operator". What do you think, should >> NASA be added to all the names ? >> >> Thanks for your opinion. >> >> -- >> *FabC* >> >> *[1] **http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/29.5630/-95.0919 >> <http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/29.5630/-95.0919>* >> *[2] http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/374485271 >> <http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/374485271>* >> *[3] http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4237285 >> <http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4237285>* >> >> _______________________________________________ >> talk mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >> >> -- *Fabrizio*
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
