Hi Eric, Am 14.07.2016 um 17:19 schrieb Éric Gillet: > However I'd believe that there is (in Europe for the example's sake) a very > low number of restaurant really named McDonalds and not part of the > franchise. So if the changeset correct 300 restaurants but 2 are "damaged" > by the automated edit, would the edit be bad enough to be reverted or not > be done in the first place ?
A mechanical edit must not cause damage. Therefore a mechanical edit which has damaged some data (damage > 0) should be reverted. Best regards Michael -- Per E-Mail kommuniziere ich bevorzugt GPG-verschlüsselt. (Mailinglisten ausgenommen) I prefer GPG encryption of emails. (does not apply on mailing lists)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
