On Monday 02 January 2017, Christian Quest wrote: > I'm pleased to announce a new version for the "french style" tiles... > running on a brand new server donated by OVH.com
Very nice. > > Main new things compared to the international style: > - tidal=* rendering I am somewhat confused about the tagging scheme you render here - is that documented somewhere? Your water areas query: (SELECT ST_Snaptogrid(way,!pixel_width!/4) as way, \"natural\",waterway,landuse,amenity, coalesce(tags->'name:fr',tags->'int_name',name) as name, tags->'basin' as basin, water, surface FROM planet_osm_polygon WHERE ( waterway in ('dock','mill_pond','riverbank','canal') or landuse in ('reservoir','water','basin','salt_pond') or \"natural\" in ('lake','water','land','glacier','mud','bayx') or amenity='fountain' or water='tidal') and building is null and way_area > !pixel_width!*!pixel_height!*10 and way && !bbox! ORDER BY z_order,way_area desc) as water_areas indicates you render any water area as well as any area tagged water=tidal no matter what the primary tag is that has surface=rocky with the rock pattern overlay. IMO this is not such a good idea because it does not really encourage correct tagging - mappers can use invalid primary tags (like natural=foo + water=tidal + surface=rocky) or use nonsense combinations (like natural=mud + surface=rocky) without the map indicating the mistake. Also the most common tag for indicating tidal features is tidal=yes and not water=tidal. You do not seem to render natural=shoal and wetland=tidalflat which are the dominant ways of mapping tidal areas at the moment (though admittingly wetland=tidalflat does not really make much sense for rocky tidal areas which are usually not flat). -- Christoph Hormann http://www.imagico.de/ _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk