On 06/03/2017 12:03 AM, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > Bas Couwenberg wrote: >> On 06/02/2017 03:43 PM, Chris Hill wrote: >>> I also object to people who provide software for OSM, used by OSM >>> community members but who must use Github to raise a problem. Let >>> the authors add the issue to github it it suits them. >> >> You apparently have no clue how software development works. I >> suggest you stick to paper and pen based systems, if you object to using >> issue trackers for software projects. > > No. OSM is not a software project, it's a community project. > > If you promote an editor that affects OSM data, you need to be responsive to > the OSM community. That means monitoring the communication channels favoured > by the OSM community and being prepared to respond to them. You cannot just > decide upon your preferred tracker and refuse to listen to concerns > elsewhere.
Ranting on the Internet does not make software better, providing constructive feedback via the appropriate channel (i.e. project issue tracker) does. > Chris has a better idea of how OSM editing works than you appear to, and I > can say that with some certainty having maintained the default osm.org > editor from 2007 to 2013. Ah yes, your lovely deprecated editor which still lets users create old-style multipolygons on a daily basis. How I love your work. See the irony in the above? _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
